home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: newshost.uwo.ca!usenet
- From: dfraser@mother.com (Dan J. Fraser)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: ZIP vs SyQuest
- Date: Sun, 31 Dec 95 17:28:50
- Organization: The University of Western Ontario, London, Ont. Canada
- Message-ID: <19951231.7C98AD0.FF88@mother.com>
- References: <4bq8mg$gp2@guava.epix.net> <4c56j2$ilr@nntp.interaccess.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ts14-8.slip.uwo.ca
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- X-Authenticated: djfraser@ts14-8.slip.uwo.ca
- X-NewsSoftware: GRn 2.1 Feb 19, 1994
-
-
- In article <4c56j2$ilr@nntp.interaccess.com> djaco@thymaster.interaccess.com (Donald Jacobson) writes:
- > BTW, I think it's a little early to speculate on long-term reliability or
- > media integrity. Might as well flip a coin...both are cool. Nothing beats
-
- Not really. You only have to look as far is the past histories of both
- companies when it comes to media integrity and long-term reliability to
- make a decision.
-
- The bottom line is that Iomega makes good equipment, and Syquest doesn't.
- 'nuff said.
-
- --
- ---- /// -------------------------------------------------------------
- __ /// Dan J. Fraser -- dfraser@mother.com | Monolith Autoplex:
- \\\/// http://www.mother.com/~dfraser | "My God! Its full of
- \XX/ IRC Nick: Optic Finger me for PGP key | cars!"
-